Vote for Yong Teck Lee

He is the only leader intelligent enough not to be fooled by greedy
West Malaysians and brave enough to say it aloud. Thank you Daily
Express for reporting his comments.

This is the sort of leader that we need. No matter how corrupt he may
appear or made to appear, these losses are nothing compared to the
losses due to the irresponsible and greedy theft of Sabahan resources.
Sabahan should wake up and don't pretend that everything is alright.
Sabah is already the worst in all areas of development, physical and
human. Sabah cannot even beat Darfur of Sudan,let alone Bangladesh.

No effort at all to eradicate poverty, instead, Sabah is made even
poorer by stealing our electricity, gas and environment, despite
having frequent power cuts and poor communications. All for what? Just
to enrich the already rich West Malaysians even more, disregarding all
economic principles. Piping gas from Sabah to Bintulu at a cost of RM
2500 billion and piping Bakun dam in Bintulu area to West Malaysia for
RM10,000.

In return, instead of using gas from Sabah, Sabah has to buy COAL from
Indonesia, to power a power plant that cost RM2500 million just to
produce 300 Mega Watt of electricity, hardly sufficient for current
Sabah needs, let alone the future.

Electricity from Bakun will cost less than RM2500 million, much less
than the single coal power plant while improving Sabahan power grid
system at the same time and much more power capacity than the 300
MWatt.

Piping the Bakun electricity to West Malaysian will only improve the
grid system for the fishes while causing environmental and safety
hazards in the South China Sea.

http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=69909

'Sabah should take back SESB'
Published on: Tuesday, January 05, 2010
Email to a friend Printer Friendly
SABAH should take back Sabah Electricity Sdn. Bhd. (SESB) since it has
failed to improve power supply in the State after its privatisation.

"Like Air Asia which was sold by the Government to the private sector
for one Ringgit, we ask that TNB shares in SESB be given back to Sabah
for one Ringgit as well," Yong said.

"Sabah has nothing to lose except the bosses from Kuala Lumpur," he
said, adding energy supply could be better managed by Sabah as the
State had the ability to do so.

He said the Sabah Electric Board (SEB) was handed over to Kuala Lumpur
by the Berjaya Government due to insufficient funds but still no
improvement was seen.

Following that, he said, SEB was privatised in 1998 and renamed SESB
when taken over by Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB).

"Twenty years after being given to Federal, Sabah's electricity
problems remain. The Berjaya Government handed over SEB to Kuala
Lumpur hoping the problem could be addressed but not so.

"Then TNB came in 11 years ago promising to overcome it but until
today, the problem remains," he said at the formation of SAPP Kampung
Kibabaig branch and receiving new members led by Florian Chong at the
residence of Jolis Podi, at Kampung Kibabaig, near here.

Yong who is a former Chief Minister said Sabah has the ability to
manage its energy supply just like Sarawak .

Sarawak run its own electricity supply via Sesco and never faced any
problems, he said, adding SAPP has a task force studying the mechanism
to take back SESB.

He said it is sheer arrogance for the Barisan Nasional (BN) Government
to pipe Sabah's natural gas to Bintulu LNG Plant 500km away at a cost
of billions Ringgit, but not allowed Sabah to use that gas for power
generation in the State.

"We are forced to buy Indonesian coal for a coal power plant from
China .

To add insult to injury, the coal power plant is targeted to be
located in the Tungku Lahad Datu Felda - which was state land given to
Felda supposed to be for local settlers but end up mostly as Felda
corporate land," he said.

He said the Bintulu LNG plant is capable of producing 25 Million ton
per annum (MTA) which is the biggest plant in the whole world.

The plant is now being expanded to take in more gas to be converted
into LNG to be sold to Japan and China at massive profits of billions
of ringgit to Petronas, he claimed.

He said on Dec 22 last year, the Senate was told by the Federal Deputy
Minister of Energy, Green Technology and Water that it is too
expensive to transmit power supply from Bakun near Bintulu to Sabah.

Yong said the Deputy Minister's reasons were because of the terrain.

"Ironically, why is it possible to pipe our gas to Bintulu? Why was
the same terrain of mountains, rivers and valleys not a problem when
it comes to pipe our gas to Bintulu? It is the same geography, same
terrain, same mountains, the same rivers, the same jungles, the same
that carries our gas away to Bintulu that cannot also take electric
power from Bakun to Sabah ," he said.

He said TNB was reported planning to transmit the same power supply
from the same Bakun dam to peninsula Malaysia, across 700km of the
South China Sea.

"Even a Form Three geography student knows...but our leaders do not
know," he said, adding he was angry not because Kuala Lumpur is
cheating Sabah, but Sabah leaders in the Federal and State Governments
are not defending Sabahans.

As result, he said Sabahans pay more for electricity, forced to take a
dirty polluting coal power plant, and still suffer power breakdowns.

"All these must change. We shall no longer keep quiet," he added.

He said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak during his visit
here in November last year had told Sabahans to compromise and accepts
the coal power plant.

"My answer is how can the PM ask the poorest state to compromise,"
Yong said.

Malaysian court: day-to-day means 24-hours a day to interview witnesses

From thefreedictionary:
http://74.125.153.132/search?q=cache:0Gt0vegO-0QJ:www.thefreedictionary.com/day-to-day+day+to+day&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=my

adj.
1. Occurring on a routine or daily basis: the day-to-day movements of
the stock market.
2. Subsisting one day at a time with little regard for the future:
lived a day-to-day existence.

But our appeal court deemed that this phrase means that MACC has the
right to interview WITNESSESS 24-hours a day.

Justices Datuk Hasan Lah, Datuk Ahmad Maarop and Datuk Syed Ahmad
Helmy Syed Ahmad

These judges, either are so ignorant of English or just blatantly
corrupt in all sense of the word.

Unfortunately this is the CURRENT LAW IN MALAYSIA.

WITNESSES WILL BE FORCED TO TESTIFY AGAINST THEIR WILL 24-HOURS A DAY,
AND MANY HAD DIED DURING CUSTODY.

Unfortunately, suspected criminals are better treated. The law do not
allow the policemen to interrogate them 24-hours a day.

It is definitely better to be a criminal than to be a witness. My
advise is for all Malaysians, to keep quiet, if you want your peace
and livelihood to survive.

How low has Malaysia gone done towards the path of destruction.

How can a nation ever survive when violent CRIMINALS are better
treated than the WITNESSES.

The only conclusion we can deduce is that we have put into power,
CRIMINALS.
Tell me, how can Malaysia ever develop at all if CRIMINALS are running
the country.
Is the so called peace and development promised by criminals worth a
cent?

Look at the status of developoment of Sabah, the least developed in
the whole world, much less than Bangladesh indeed, as viewed by
Bangalis in Sabah.

We haven't looked at the high incidence of poverty in Sabah, among the
highest in the world as well.

Sabah, Malaysia, peaceful? Are you willing to bet on it by leaving
your children unattended?

http://bernama.com/bernama/v5/newsgeneral.php?id=463821

December 22, 2009 13:30 PM

Tan Boon Wah To Appeal Against Ruling On MACC Working Hours

PUTRAJAYA, Dec 22 (Bernama) -- Kajang municipal councillor Tan Boon
Wah on Tuesday filed a motion for leave to appeal against the Appeal
Court's ruling last week that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission
(MACC) can interrogate witnesses after office hours.

Tan, 39, filed the motion and his sworn affidavit through his counsel,
Karpal Singh at the Federal Court registry here.

In the motion, Tan said the intended appeal was important as it
involved novel questions and issues arising for the first time in the
country and the Federal Court decision would be an advantage to the
public.

Tan also listed five questions to be determined by the court, among
others, whether the phrase 'day-to-day' under section 30(3)(a) of the
MACC Act 2009 encompasses only office hours or a continuous period of
24 hours.

Karpal Singh, when met by reporters, said he would write to the
Federal Court for an early date of hearing.

"This is a very serious matter, therefore it is important for the
Federal Court as the highest court to decide on this issue once and
for all," he said.

He also hoped that Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail would
appear personally in the proceedings later. "There are far-reaching
consequences of the Appeal Court decision.

If the decision is right, it means that the MACC officers can come to
your house at 3am and you are required to go to MACC office to be
questioned. That situation is unacceptable.

"Witnesses will also be reluctant to come forward to give evidence
knowing that they will be harassed and questioned round-the-clock
continuously," he said.

On Dec 17, a panel of three Court of Appeal judges unanimously held
that Section 30(3)(a) of the MACC Act did not restrict to working
hours the time for a witness to be examined in an investigation.

Justices Datuk Hasan Lah, Datuk Ahmad Maarop and Datuk Syed Ahmad
Helmy Syed Ahmad also overturned the High Court decision restricting
the interrogation to office hours, between 8.30am and 5.30pm.

On Nov 19, High Court judge Mohammad Ariff Md Yusof, in allowing a
judicial review filed by Tan, ruled that Section 30(3)(a) of the MACC
Act 2009 did not empower the MACC to investigate a witness "round-the-
clock".

Tan had sued MACC chief commissioner Datuk Seri Ahmad Said Hamdan,
MACC assistant superintendent Mohammad Hassan Zulkifli and the MACC,
claiming that his detention and questioning for 16 hours overnight by
the MACC was unlawful, which resulted in him suffering losses and
damages.

-- BERNAMA

Will Historical facts, 16th of Sep, ever be acknowledged by Malayans disguising as Malaysians?

Only after 46 years has the true date of the formation of Malaysia,
well documented in history books and documents and even the
constitution of Malaysia, has ever been recognised.

Many Malaysians even believe that Sabah got its independence on the
31st of August despite all the statements and pictures in history
books that British sovereignty over North Borneo will only cease on
the 16th of September. So how can Sabah be independent when British
officers still make the final decisions?

Maybe they don't realise that North Borneo was Sabah. Or don't
understand the meaning of sovereignty.

With so many years of the distortion of history in order to humiliate
Sabah, no wonder Sabah is among the poorest in the world. Bangladeshis
in Sabah are laughing over Sabahan claims of being developed right in
front of myself. Based on statistics, I believe they are right.

Even Darfur have towns that are better than many towns in Sabah. Have
you ever find any schools that don't have tables and chairs, except in
Sabah? Even Palestine, under heavy Israeli bombardments have better
schools and tables than schools in Kota Kinabalu, the capital of
Sabah, based on pictures of these Palestinian schools being bombed.

Malaysia Day on Sept 16 declared a public holiday
Husna Yusop

KUALA LUMPUR (Oct 19, 2009) : Beginning next year, Sept 16 will be
made a public holiday for the whole country in conjunction with the
Malaysia Day celebration, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak
declared in the Dewan Rakyat today.

He said the decision was made by the cabinet recently to have a twin
celebration for the country's national day.

"The Independence Day on Aug 31 reminds us of the struggle to achieve
independence from the colonialists and it will be celebrated with
various official functions like parade and others.

"Malaysia Day will be celebrated with programmes to strengthen unity,
promote inter-racial understanding, portray people's success and
accomplishment in sports, socio-culture, arts and others which will
lift up the spirit of 1Malaysia," he said.

In an immediate response, United Pasokmomogun Kadazandusun Murut
Organisation (UPKO) president Tan Sri Bernard Dompok who is Member of
Parliament for Penampang, applauded Najib's decision.

He said it is a historical fact that the Federation of Malaysia was
formed on Sept 16 1963 when the Federation of Malaya, Singapore,
Sarawak and Sabah mutually agreed to become a new nation.

"Malaysia, therefore, is only 46 years old. The 52 years of
independence is only for the Persekutuan Tanah Melayu or better known
today as Semenanjung.

"Some have tried to equate our position to that of the United States
of America. They argue that although other states like Hawaii joined
much later, the country dates its formation as 4th July 1776."

"Ours is of course very different because before 1963, there was no
Malaysia yet. There was only the Federation of Malaya and this
federation together with Singapore, Sarawak and Sabah negotiated to
set up a new country called Malaysia," he said.

"While we are happy to celebrate with Semenanjung their independence
from colonial rule on Aug 31 1963, I am sure all of you will agree
that it is indeed right and proper that all Malaysians celebrate this
year 46 years of nationhood," he added.

"We cannot distort history," said Dompok, who is also Minister of
Plantation Industries and Commodites.

He also stated that some national leaders seem to give the impression
that Malaysia was born on Aug 31, 1957.

"The level of awareness among Malaysians in Semenanjung on the
formation of Malaysia is lower than those in Sabah and Sarawak, so
much so they believe Malaya or Semenanjung is Malaysia," said Dompok
in his blog.

94.8% Sabahans disagree with 31 August

Banggi Island of Sabah never benefited from Malaysia

Banggi had suffered under 75% poverty rate since Malaysia, which is
more than 53 years as so called Malaysians would like to call it or
rather Malayans. Actually only 47 years after Sabah formed Malaysia
and never joined Malaysia at all, because Malaysia never existed
before that date, not even the name.

And yet this article bother to tittle itself as Banggi the benefector
of Malaysia?

Poverty rate is still 75% and it will take another 10 years before
this half baked ideas will take in and if other Felcra and Felda
schemes are to be viewed as a guide, NEVER. They will just become
slaves in perpetual debt because they are not even allowed to work on
their so called "LAND".

As to Electricty? It is still only SOLAR POWERED, meaning, not
reliable.

They don't even talk about water. There is no clean water supply in
Pulau Banggi and no road that you can think of. So you are still brave
enough to visit this island????

"Like many of the places that have undergone transformation since
Merdeka or after the formation of Malaysia, Pulau Banggi is finally
seeing light at the end of the tunnel with tarred roads, clean water
and electricity."

The tarred roads, clean water and electricty had existed even before
Malaysia or as this author like to state Merdeka which was in 1957,
when Sabah was still a British Colony.

In fact there are more of them under the British then after Malaysia.
It was not repaired properly and population had grown tremendously.
The water and electricity is still distributed around a small area of
Karakit, not throughout the island, and therefore will not benefit
most of the people. I never will expect poverty to drop significantly
below 75% in the foreseeable future, unless the government changed the
figures, just as 25% turned into 17% overnight.

August 18, 2009 14:28 PM

Residents Of Pulau Banggi The Benefactors Of Malaysia

By Kristy Inus

In conjunction with the Merdeka Month celebration.

KUDAT, Aug 18 (Bernama) -- About half a century ago Pulau Banggi in
Sabah was no more than a fishing enclave without any basic amenities.

However, after Sabah became part of Malaysia, Pulau Banggi located in
the waters of Kudat witnessed some transformation.

Pulau Banggi was officially declared as a district in 1975 but the
island of 14,000 people and 43 villages once had a dubious distinction
because 75 per cent of its population lived below the poverty line.

The majority of the people on the island is from the Ubian ethnic
group followed by the Dusun Banggi, Kegayan, Suluk and Bajau.

Previously the island dwellers were dependent on fishing and
subsistence farming but now they are making a transition into rubber
cultivation and working with Felcra Bhd, the agency entrusted with the
first agropolitan project on the island.

Like many of the places that have undergone transformation since
Merdeka or after the formation of Malaysia, Pulau Banggi is finally
seeing light at the end of the tunnel with tarred roads, clean water
and electricity.

THEN AND NOW

Even up to two years ago the dwellers here were using generators that
can only provide electricity up to 12 hours per day and even that is
restricted to the Karakit town fronting the jetty. But now villagers
in seven areas enjoy electricity for the whole day through the solar
hybrid system costing RM21 million.

If previously there were no piped water to the villages, today a
network of 36km of pipes provide clean water to eight villages and
there are also tarred roads.

The first phase of the Pulau Banggi Agropolitan Project launched in
2007 to eradicate hardcore poverty has been completed. The initial
phase covers 700 hectares of rubber plantation while the second phase
involves 1,100 hectares with 980 hectares already cleared for
planting.

Recently 100 heads of hardcore poor families in the island were
offered homes under the local community housing project (PPMS).

One of the recipients, Talhaja Junaidal, 49, noted that she is lucky
to receive the house and believed that it would help in providing for
her children's future.

The single mother of four before this was farming and sewing where she
earned up to RM400 per month. But now she is also paid RM18 for a
day's work in the Felcra's agropolitan project.

Talhaja said her old house at Kampung Kobong has no clean water or
electricity supply and when they move into their new house, her 25
year-old eldest son would also be participating in the agropolitan
project.

"I am more than happy. I am really thankful, this is a sign of good
tidings and hope they will continue.

"This time I got a job and more or less a permanent one, I hope to see
more benefits after the agropolitan project brings return to the
participants," she said.

THANKFUL

Abdullah Sulaiman, 45, from Kampung Perpaduan, noted that the
residents of Pulau Banggi have always yearned for a better life by
getting into the mainstream of development.

"Before Sabah became part of Malaysia there was nothing here, almost
no facilities or employment opportunities...we lived hands to mouth.
Thus we are very happy looking at the situation now.

"We not only want to see the current generation benefiting from the
agropolitan project but also our future generations," said the father
of 10.

A civil servant from the Banggi People Development Leader's Unit
(UPKR), Amir Hamzah, 46, observed that the difference now and then is
evident to anyone living here.

Amir who was born and bred on this island stated that if previously
they had to depend on the sea for a living, including him, now they
are many employment opportunities on this island.

"I even started working with UPKR from this year, last year I was
still a fisherman. So we have to be thankful to Felcra for
contributing to the well-being of the people," added Amir.

PULAU BANGGI ASSURED OF DEVELOPMENT

Rural and Regional Development Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Shafie Apdal
during his recent working visit to Pulau Banggi conveyed another good
news to the residents, their request for a multipurpose hall in
Kampung Karakit has been granted.

He is happy with the infrastructure development on the island and
hoped that the islanders would soon be free from the shackles of
poverty.

"Many years ago when I came here as a government official, Pulau
Banggi was not like this...the efforts to develop land and transform
the people takes time.

He pointed out that many of the agropolitan projects in Peninsula are
already bearing fruits with the project participants increasing their
income from RM200 a month to RM1,000 and RM1,300 per month.

He advised the residents here who find it difficult to make a
transition from sea base economic activities to land based activities,
not to give up halfway because there is a greater reward in the long-
term.

The people in Pulau Banggi now have every reason to smile as they are
slowly coming out from the vicious cycle of poverty, all within the
spirit of Merdeka that promised a better future for everyone.

-- BERNAMA

We provide (subscription-based)
news coverage in our Newswire service.
Back Top

One Malaysia is all a lie

What more proof do you need to be shown?

United Nations have already recognised Sabah as among the poorest and highest income gap in the world.

United States condemn Sabah as tghe worst centre for Human Slavery.
Malaysia is one of 3, but 80% cases are in Sabah, which makes Sabah the worst with 100% certainty.


'Cabotage policy should be liberalised further'

Published on: Thursday, June 11, 2009

Email to a friend Printer Friendly

Kota Kinabalu: The Federation of Sabah Manufacturers (FSM) on Wednesday thanked the Government for taking the first step to liberalise the cabotage policy which has been in existence for almost 30 years but said it did not go far enough.

Its President, Datuk Wong Ken Thau, said the policy has directly or indirectly affected the livelihood of the people of Sabah as well as industries all these years.

"The Federation hoped this would lead to more liberalisation in the near future," he said after chairing a meeting following the selective liberalisation of the policy at Wisma Tun Fuad Stephens, here.

It was participated by its council members comprising the presidents and chairmen of all chambers of commerce and industry, furniture association, and timber industries association, among others.

The Government last week agreed to liberalise the policy for containerised transhipment cargoes for sectors between Sepanggar, Bintulu, Kuching and Tanjung Pelepas and vice-versa.

The selective liberalisation will allow foreign vessels to carry containerised transhipment cargoes between the above sectors without the need for a domestic shipping licence, the Ministry of Transport said in a statement.

The liberalisation gives an opportunity for importers and exporters in Sabah and Sarawak, as well as industries, to enjoy a low fare cost due to competition in the shipping transportation sector, which can be translated into cheaper price of consumer goods and industrial needs.

The liberalisation came into effect on June 3. Before that (liberalisation) foreign vessels (foreign shipping companies) were not allowed to take in Malaysian goods that were produced in Peninsular Malaysia to bring them to Sabah.

"Likewise foreign vessels were not allowed to take goods produced in Sabah to Tanjung Pelepas or Port KelangÉthese so-called domestic trade was only allowed for local vessels/Malaysian-owned shipping vessels," said Wong.

With the implementation of the liberalisation of the cabotage policy, he said foreign vessels are allowed to pick up goods from Peninsular Malaysia or Port Kelang to Sabah but "it only involves the containerised transhipment goods."

"Containerised transhipment goods means goods which transit in Port Kelang from foreign ports/countries awaiting other vessels to take them to Sabah. This means foreign vessels are allowed to pick up from Port Kelang goods which are not manufactured in Peninsular Malaysia but only that coming from overseasÉso these are the goods the foreign vessels now can take to Sabah," he said.

So the liberalisation of the policy does not apply to locally-manufactured goods from the peninsula, he said, adding before and after the introduction of the liberalisation of the policy foreign vessels cannot take goods from the peninsula to Sabah.

In other words, liberalisation of the policy only covers containerised transhipment goods which come from overseas and land in Port Kelang, and not locally manufactured goods from the peninsula.

Only Malaysian flagged ships are allowed to take locally-manufactured goods from the peninsula to Sabah, he added.

"That means this liberalisation of the cabotage policy only involves a small segmentÉ I do not think it is going to benefit us very much at this point of time, because we know the containerised transhipment goods from the peninsula to Sabah is very limitedÉthere are not many such goods coming in to the State, actually probably less than 200 containers per month, or probably less than that," he said.

The Federation hoped the Government can have greater liberalisation on this sector, because due to the load problem "I don't think any foreign vessel would like to come in to just take such goods to Sabah or Sarawak...it is unlikely to happen, and the chances of lowering the prices of freight may probably take a longer time until we have enough containerised transhipment goods."

"So we hope the government actually can liberalise further so as to allow goods made in the peninsula to be carried by foreign vessels to SabahÉthat is our hope, that the government can further relax or further open up, further liberalise, so that foreign vessels can be allowed to carry locally-manufactured goods from the peninsula to Sabah, and vice versa," he said.

He said the Federation knows it is the Government's intention to also take care of the Malaysian shipping industry and help ensure its continued survival, but hoped under the spirit of 1Malaysia the Government would not forget the industries in Sabah and the consumers here.

"Facts I get from the Malaysian Shipping Association (Masa) show the shipping industry in Malaysia has grown from four ships to 3,400 ships, but unfortunately our manufacturing sector contribution to the State's GDP (gross domestic products) has dropped from 25% to only 9% today," he said.

"We hope that by supporting the shipping industry there will be another formula to assist the local industries here, or make Sabah more conducive to foreign investment so as to make Sabah more cheaper for foreign investment", he said.

At the same time if the Government find it difficult to open up (allow foreign vessels to take locally-manufactured goods from the peninsula to Sabah and vice versa) because of the shipping industry, he said the Federation suggests the government to make the Port of Sepanggar the official international hub port for this region.

"By doing so I think we can attract more cargo and containers to come direct to Sabah," he said.

Secondly he said the Federation also hoped the State government can look seriously into setting up a Yayasan Sabah shipping line or for it to be involved in the shipping industry, by getting the support of a Federal grant especially under the Sabah Development Corridor (SDC).

He said they also hoped the government can look seriously into setting up a board or a monitoring body to look into the transparency of the so-called high freight charges as well as the other charges involved, so as to ensure the business and manufacturing sectorsare not affected by the adjustment.

The Federation also suggests the government can look into giving a matching grant or subsidy to be created for importers and exporters in Sabah, to let the local industries get involved more actively in the export/import business in foreign countries to ensure their survival.

Wong said they have also often received complaints about the shipping vessels that have going around this sector (Sabah) as being not very efficient because they are rather old.

"This may increase the vessel maintenance and other costs. The shipping industries, if they have made more money, they should give back to the industries to make it more effectiveÉif not we suggest they look into the policy of merging some of these shipping companies, so that they will be more efficient when unloading their cargo in our ports here," he said.

He said the Federation hoped the government will once and for all review the national cabotage policy because the time has come to review it thoroughly so that it will benefit all industries, not only the shipping industry.

"In the spirit of 1Malaysia, we hope the government can review this. Let's not make a policy that will only benefit one or two industries," he said.

The Federation also thanked Transport Minister Datuk Ong Tee Keat and others leaders at both Federal and State levels as well as all the chambers and associations for their effort in the liberalisation of the cabotage policy.

"We welcome it simply because this is the first step, after so many years we have been fighting for it.

So this is a breakthrough or something like that.

For the first time the government has decided to respond to our request."

"The shipping industry is also a very important industry, we accept the fact. At the same time we also need to make sure that when the government protects the shipping industry it should not also forget the other industries especially in Sabah," he said.

No toilet at the most beautiful beach

This is the only toilet that you'll ever get.