Kota Kinabalu the 8th cheapest in the world
Lombok, Indonesia, di Timur timur. Rm17. Tapi tengok review score nya. Ertinya teruk lah servisnya. Kalau mahu cari yang lebih baik, perlu bayar lebih, bererti sama juga dengan Tuaran lah.
Sabah is allocated less than 8% of the National budget, when Sabah's population is more than 13%, and area more than 25%, because it is deemed less economical to develop Sabah and Sarawak. Sarawak is only fit to be a source of cheap renewable resources such as Bakun Hydro electric dam that is not even sold to Sabah, that is full of electric power failures.
Lombok, Indonesia, di Timur timur. Rm17. Tapi tengok review score nya. Ertinya teruk lah servisnya. Kalau mahu cari yang lebih baik, perlu bayar lebih, bererti sama juga dengan Tuaran lah.
Tuaran, Sabah rm25 sehari. Mahal sikit dari di Lombok yang konon paling murah di dunia. Lombok ini di Timur, tiada apa apa kecuali pelancongan. Tuaran ini 20km dari Kota Kinabalu, pengeluar minyak, kelapa sawit, kayu balak terbesar di Malaysia, termasuk pelancongan yang boleh kalahkan Lombok, tapi paling ramai orang miskin jauh betul sehingga 40% berada di Sabah. Kota Kinabalu pun ke 8 dari 10 termurah di dunia. Lombok konon termurah di dunia sebagai wakil Indonesia. Tapi Tuaran lagi murah, dan boleh di panggil bandar satelit kota Kinabalu juga. Ertinya orang Sabah susah mahu hidup di Lombok Indonesia kalau pakai gaji di Kota Kinabalu.
Free Malaysia Today: Come home and make a difference, young Sabahans told.
This is Article 4(3), despite recommendation to amend this article to comply with Malaysia Agreement, this was never carried out so Malaya never had a single thread of intention to honour any of the provision of the agreement. Need to go to International Courts for any violation of the agreements as evidenced by the constitution itself.
No point in questioning the validity of the constitution of article 4(3) is not amended. KK High Court is right in stating that we can apply law of torts to claim damages, as proven by the constitutional amendments but we cannot even challenge it in Malaysian courts. By not amending Article 4(3), Malaya already had no intention to honour any of the provision of the Malaysia Agreement. Just go to International Court. Need to verify article 4(3).
This is the 40% requirements which overides the constitution. If not in the constitution, this condition applies.