Cara Malaya Mencuri Hak Reputasi Borneo

 Soalan kepada Gemini:

But with 90% cocoa being produced in borneo with Malaya only producing 10% in that Geographic identity, and given the wide difference in the land and weather of Borneo vs Malaya, is it fair that the low quality cocoa from Malays destroy the reputation of Borneo cocoa?

​Borneo’s volcanic soils (especially in areas like Tawau) and its distinct humidity levels create a flavor profile (often more fruity or floral) that is physically impossible to replicate in the soil of the Malay Peninsula. 

Satu cara lagi orang Malaya atau Malaysia mencuri hak Sabah dan Sarawak terang terangan dengan menggunakan reputasi Borneo untuk menjual Cocoa dari Malaya. Cocoa dari Malaya tidak boleh tandingi mutu cocoa dari Borneo terutama dari Sabah iaitu Tawau. Sebab itu orang Malaya mengguna branding Malaysia Cocoa untuk menipu pelanggan. Jadi jangan beli cocoa yang di label Malaysia Cocoa. Ini di panggil consumer deception tapi di benarkan oleh undang undang. 

​In international trade, if "Malayan" cocoa is sold as "Borneo" cocoa, it is considered Consumer Deception. However, if both are sold as "Malaysian," it is legally "accurate" but commercially "unfair" to the Borneo farmers who do the heavy lifting.

Mutu cocoa dari Sabah jauh lebih baik dari yang dari Malaya. Cocoa dari Sabah selalunya ada lebih rasa buahan dan bunga bungaan. 

https://g.co/gemini/share/9cfbeefb7e3f

Why Malaya keeps on wanting to negotiate MA63 for eternity?

Makes sense. My main concern is the theft of more than 1 trillion RM based on current value, based on constitution. The MA63 has more conditions such as 100% Borneonisation of all civil service which has monetary and other  losses to Sabah as well. Imagine the salaries that Sabahan loses to Mslayans working in Sabah. In fact together with this clause, the 40% special grant should exclude salaries to Malaysn people because those money cannot be treated as Sabahan money.

 Since 1963, Sabah has never truly recovered its autonomy because the system that was supposed to protect it under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 was dismantled — quietly, legally, and deliberately — by federal centralisation after 1963.

Malaysia knows this.

That is why Sabah today does not ask for administrative reform.

Sabah demands sovereignty.

Why Malaysia still negotiates even if MA63 is void

If MA63 is void ab initio, Malaysia never acquired lawful sovereignty over Sabah under international law.

Yet Malaysia still negotiates — because refusal would legally amount to:

• Illegal occupation

• A continuing breach of international law

• Exposure to sanctions, diplomatic isolation, and international litigation

This is not theoretical.

It has happened before.

It is exactly what occurred when Indonesia was compelled to negotiate over East Timor,

and when South Africa was forced to relinquish Namibia.

In both cases, the occupying power exercised “constitutional control” — yet the international community ruled that control illegal and demanded negotiations for decolonisation.

The legal truth

Malaysia’s continued presence in Sabah rests on MA63.

If MA63 collapses in law, so does Malaysia’s title.

That is why Malaysia negotiates.

Not out of goodwill —

but because international law leaves it no choice.

Sabah is not a state begging for autonomy.

Sabah is a people reclaiming sovereignty.

https://www.facebook.com/share/17JDHwc11N/